Vaccines are Unavoidably Unsafe
- Details
- Category: Vaccines
Vaccination is a medical intervention. United States law considers vaccines to be “unavoidably unsafe”.1 All medical interventions must be freely chosen. There are 26 doses of 11 vaccines currently required by West Virginia Law for school attendance.2 The VAERS database has cumulatively recorded 60, 396 serious adverse reactions requiring hospitalization and 6913 deaths nationwide for these vaccines,3 with the actual figures being 10 times to 100 times greater, due to under and misreporting (600,396 to 6,003,960 serious adverse reactions and 69,130 to 691,300 deaths).4 The Vaccine Court has awarded $4.2 billion in compensation for vaccine injuries.5 No randomized controlled studies have ever been done comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated populations. No one has presented scientific data that proves that any given vaccine is more beneficial than harmful. A recent analysis has proven that the DTP vaccine, used in the United States until 1996 and still in use throughout the world IS more harmful than beneficial.6 Dr. Peter Aaby, a world renowned researcher states “I think it’s important to recognize that no routine vaccine was tested for all the effect on mortality in randomized trials before being introduced. I guess most of you think that we know what all our vaccines are doing, we don’t. “7
1. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf
2. https://oeps.wv.gov/immunizations/Pages/default.aspx#school
4. hhttps://www.urbanlifetraining.org/index.php/vaccine-choice/318-serious-injuries-and-deaths-from-west-virginia-required-vaccines
No commentsSerious Injuries and Deaths Caused by West Virginia Required Vaccines
- Details
- Category: Vaccines
Click on the percent size on the lower right to zoom the chart.
Click on the page icon on the lower right to download a copy of the chart, which you can print out.
Eight Facts About Forced Vaccination in West Virginia
- Details
- Category: Vaccines
- Vaccination is a medical intervention. United States law considers vaccines to be “unavoidably unsafe”.1 All medical interventions must be freely chosen. There are 26 doses of 11 vaccines currently required by West Virginia Law for school attendance.2 The VAERS database has cumulatively recorded 60, 396 serious adverse reactions requiring hospitalization and 6913 deaths nationwide for these vaccines,3 with the actual figures being 10 times to 100 times greater, due to under and misreporting (600,396 to 6,003,960 serious adverse reactions and 69,130 to 691,300 deaths).4 The Vaccine Court has awarded $4.2 billion in compensation for vaccine injuries.5 No randomized controlled studies have ever been done comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated populations. No one has presented scientific data that proves that any given vaccine is more beneficial than harmful. A recent analysis has proven that the DTP vaccine, used in the United States until 1996 and still in use throughout the world IS more harmful than beneficial.6 Dr. Peter Aaby, a world renowned researcher states “I think it’s important to recognize that no routine vaccine was tested for all the effect on mortality in randomized trials before being introduced. I guess most of you think that we know what all our vaccines are doing, we don’t. “7
- The vaccine industry is fraught with conflicts of interest. Doctors, who are members of the American Medical Association or the American Academy of Pediatrics, have an inherent conflict of interest. They belong to associations that oppose any non-medical vaccine exemptions.8,9 At the same time, they make money by vaccinating their patients. Pharmaceutical companies and medical associations give donations to both local and national candidates. Pharmaceutical companies generate $50 billion in sales from vaccines, up from $750 million in 1986 before Federal law stopped individuals from being able to sue pharmaceutical companies; an increase of 67 times.10 State mandates insure a steady stream of income for pharmaceutical companies, no advertising needed. Julie Gerberding, now Executive Vice President of pharmaceutical giant Merck, was director of the Centers for Disease Control, the agency responsible for overseeing vaccine safety and recommending vaccines, from 2002 to 2009.
Read more: Eight Facts About Forced Vaccination in West Virginia
Senator Mike Maroney and the Moral Bankruptcy of West Virginia Legislative Leadership
- Details
- Category: Vaccines
Senator Mike Maroney, the chair of the West Virginia Senate Health and Human Services Committee, was arraigned on Wednesday, August 28th, 2019 on charges of conspiracy, house of ill fame and assignation and prostitution. He is accused of soliciting sex from a woman after allegedly arranging at least two encounters with her in his hometown of Glen Dale WV. Mike Maroney is a medical doctor who practices radiology at Radiology Associations in New Martinsville, WV.
Is there a correlation between the moral corruption of Dr. Maroney and his actions as a West Virginia Senator? As chair of the Health and Human Services Committee during the 2019 legislative session, he refused to allow SB 454, which will provide religious and conscientious exemptions from vaccination to West Virginia parents, to have a hearing and be released for a vote in the WV Senate.
In fact, the exact same thing has happened 29 times out of 34 exemption bills introduced in both the WV House and WV Senate over the past 19 years. Twenty Nine times, the bills died in the Health and Human Resources Committee, whether in the House of Delegates or in the Senate. Only one bill was approved by the Senate, but rejected by the House in 2003. That bill originated in the Judiciary committee. It should be noted that the Health and Human Resource committees are most always chaired by doctors, who are, by definition, conflicted regarding the issue of vaccination mandates.
Read more: Senator Mike Maroney and the Moral Bankruptcy of West Virginia Legislative Leadership
Update on forced Vaccination in Washington DC and West Virginia
- Details
- Category: Vaccines
A hearing was held by the District of Columbia Council on June 26, 2019 on Bill B23-0171, Minor Consent for Vaccinations Amendment Act of 2019
Here is the bill summary - "As introduced, this bill permits a minor of any age to consent to receive a vaccine where the vaccination is recommended by the United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. It also establishes that if a minor is able to comprehend the need for, the nature of, and any significant risks inherent in the medical care then informed consent is established."
What! A minor of any age can consent to a vaccination. This is an outrage. What are the DC Council members thinking? Of course, we should not be too surprised, as 12 year old girls can already get on abortion in Washington DC without parental consent! DC residents, call and email your DC Council Members, in your Ward and at Large Councilmembers offices, to express your outrage: https://dccouncil.us/councilmembers/. You can watch the public hearing held on June 26, 2019 here: http://dc.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=5105.
At 23:35 CM Mary Cheh opines about using this bill as an opportunity to "make sure we have the highest levels of vaccination possible". Maybe Ms. Cheh should learn from West Virginia, which has one of the highest vaccination rates in the nation due to its no school without vaccinations and no vaccination exemptions policy. Unfortunately, West Virginia ranks 39th, with one being the best, in infant mortality. Just maybe there is some connection to the refusal to provide any vaccine exemptions.
And make no mistake, this is not at all about children's health, but about taking away parents’ rights to decide what is best for their children. Specifically, there is a desire to punish religious parents. Check out 25:45 in the video. The very first testimony is from is from Allison Gill, vice president for legal and policy at American Atheists. That should raise eyebrows right away. Why is the American Atheist society so big in pushing vaccines? Ms. Gill says “American Atheists is a national organization set up to protect the wall of separation between religion and government". Wrong. The first amendment begins with “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. There is no wall of separation, which is a mischaracterization of words in a letter written by Thomas Jefferson. Rather, it is Ms. Gill's organization that is infringing on the free practice of religious beliefs. The first amendment is written to prevent the establishment of a state religion, and to allow the free exercise of religion. Ms. Gill has it backwards. The proposed mandates of this bill are prohibited by the first amendment. They are also prohibited because parents are the primary caretakers of their children, not a coercive state.
Read more: Update on forced Vaccination in Washington DC and West Virginia
Substance Abuse and Premature Sex Prevention Update
- Details
- Category: Youth Prevention Initiatives
By Stacey Urban
A surgeon General’s report “Facing Addiction in America” finds that abuse of substances such as alcohol and drugs is a growing problem in the United States. The adolescent years are critical at-risk periods. Research show that many adults with substance abuse problems started drinking or taking drugs in their teen years. Teen-age substance abuse is linked to sexual risk behaviors that lead young people to contract sexually transmitted diseases and become pregnant. More needs to be done to lessen such consequences.
The report concludes that prevention programs for this risky behaviors should focus on individuals, peers, families, schools and communities. When students’ schools environment are supportive and parents are engaged in their children’s live they are less likely to use alcohol or take drugs or engage in premarital sexual behavior.
The CDC says in their resource that for primary prevention activities targeting substance use and sexual risk behaviors to be effective, they should include “Peer-led drug and alcohol resistance programs”.
But why not include peer led sex resistance programs? That is exactly the proven concept behind the Urban Life Training proposal for every school district to have a Right Choices Youth Prevention Corps.
Right Choices Youth Prevention Corps for West Virginia
- Details
- Category: Youth Prevention Initiatives
Seventy eight percent of West Virginia ninth grade students are abstaining from sex. Yet, this percentage drops to 32% for twelfth grade students. We are missing a great opportunity.
Youth who are abstaining from sex can serve as a great resource who can encourage their peers to make right choices. Youth who are not sexually active enjoy helping their peers as a peer counselor. They also gain speaking skills and a mutual support group.
There are many benefits for youth who decide to wait to have sex. Here are a few:
- Young adults who graduate from high school, get a full time job and wait until 21 and married before having children have a 7% chance that their children will live in poverty. Those who don’t follow any of these rules have a 74% chance that their children will live in poverty.
- Couples not sexually active before marriage report higher levels of romance, are more likely to be faithful in marriage and have a lower risk of divorce.
- Being sexually active is correlated with higher rates of self-destructive behaviors such as much higher rates of using alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana and other drugs, running away from home, being arrested by the police and suspended from school for both boys and girls.
- In addition, sexually active girls (ages 12-16) have a two or three times higher risk to be lonely, upset, or tense, five times higher risk to consider hurting themselves and six times higher risk to attempt suicide.
There were 2920 teen pregnancies in West Virginia in the most recent reporting year (2013), and 1416 births in 2017. These births cost taxpayers $37,953,000. Why not leverage the positive message that can be given to peers by youths who are abstaining from sex. Such a program will pay for itself and save taxpayers countless dollars.
To Date or Not to Date
- Details
- Category: Relationships
Many people these days think something is wrong with non dating teens. That dating teens learn social skills and grow emotionally. However research from the University of Georgia discovered that not dating is a beneficial way to go for teens, according to an UGA (University of Georgia) Today article by Rebecca Ayer. .
“The majority of teens have had some type of romantic experience by 15 to 17 years of age, or middle adolescence,” said Brooke Douglas, a doctoral student in health promotion at UGA’s College of Public Health and the study’s lead author.
If dating was considered normal and essential for a teen’s individual development and well-being, Ms.Douglas began to wonder what this suggested about adolescents who chose not to date.
“Does this mean that teens that don’t date are maladjusted in some way? That they are social misfits? Few studies had examined the characteristics of youth who do not date during the teenage years, and we decided we wanted to learn more,” she said.
President Trump Comments on Big Pharma Price Gouging
- Details
- Category: Richard's Blog
On August 15th, 2019, President Trump implicated big pharma in keeping drug prices high and not giving seniors a choice to choose lower prices. Here is what the President said:
Our ambitious campaign to reduce the price of prescription drugs has produced the largest decline in drug prices in 51 years. The only decline in 51 years. We have launched a historic initiative to require price transparency, empowering you to choose the lowest price for yourself and for your family. Believe it or not, you didn’t have the right to go in and price your drugs. Who could even believe this? I wonder if big pharma had something to do with that. So we’re going to have transparency.
Read more: President Trump Comments on Big Pharma Price Gouging